På forstoffet strekker det seg ca 9

På forstoffet strekker det seg ca 9,8 cm ned fra skulderbretten. På baksiden er det noe verre å se, men det går i hvert fall ned til ermekilen. Siden det mørke partiet på skulderen utgjør 3,5 cm, mens det mørke partiet på K1 utgjør 6 cm, betyr det at bakstoffet har blitt skrådd 2,5 cm mer fra livet og ned enn fra livet og opp. Gjessing har tolket det motsatt; at bakstoffet har smalnet inn fra livet og ned. Jeg kan imidlertid ikke forstå hvorfor han har tolket det slik, selv med K1 feilplassert. Det er ingenting som tyder på at bakstoffet her har smalnet inn. Splitten midt bak er i hvert fall skåret trådrett så lenge denne kan følges, og avstanden fra splitten til kile A holder seg på 21 cm hele veien.

Resultater (engelsk) 1:

On the forstoffet stretching it out approx 9.8 cm down from the shoulder fold. On the back is there anything worse to see, but it goes at least down to ermekilen. Since the dark party on the shoulder make up the 3.5 cm, while the dark party at the K1 make up 6 cm, it means that behind the drug has become more skrådd 2.5 cm from the waist down than from the waist up. it has interpreted the Gjessing along the opposite; that behind the drug has narrowed from the waist down. However, I cannot understand why he has interpreted it this way, even with K1 misplaced. There is nothing to suggest that behind the drug here has narrowed. The split mid back is at least cut as long as this trådrett can be followed, and the distance from slit to wedge A remains at 21 cm all the way.

Resultater (engelsk) 2:

On feedstuff extends about 9.8 cm down from shoulder crease. On the back there is nothing worse to see, but it is certainly down to ermekilen. Since the dark portion of the shoulder constitutes 3.5cm, while the dark portion of K1 represents 6 cm, it means bakstoffet have been inclined 2,5 cm more from the waist down than from the waist up. Gjessing have interpreted the opposite; that bakstoffet has narrowed from the waist down. However, I can not understand why he has interpreted it that way, even with K1 misplaced. There is nothing to suggest that bakstoffet here has narrowed into. Slit at center back is at least cut line straight while this can be followed, and the distance from the slit to wedge A remains at 21 cm throughout.

Resultater (engelsk) 3:

On forstoffet stretches it by about 9.8 cm down from skulderbretten. On the back is there anything worse to see, but it goes in each case, down to ermekilen. Since the dark lot on shoulder constitutes 3.5 cm, while the dark lot on K1 makes up 6 cm, it means that bakstoffet has been sloped fronted versions offering 2.5 cm more from life and down than from life and up. Gjessing has interpreted the opposite.That bakstoffet has smalnet from life and down. However, i can not understand why he has interpreted it that way, even with K1 misplaced. There is nothing to indicate that bakstoffet here have smalnet inn. Dichotomy at the back is in each case, cut trådrett as long as this can be followed, and the distance from dichotomy to wedge A stays at 21 cm all the way.