Siden varpskillene er godt synlig p

Siden varpskillene er godt synlig på forsiden, kilene og ermet, mens lite synlig på baksiden av kofta der stoffet virker best bevart, er trolig baksiden mest representativ for hvordan varpskillene har tatt seg ut originalt. På baksiden er det bevart et lolag som trolig stammer fra en lett valking, og som gjør at fargeskillene blir mindre tydelige. Schjølberg tror kofta har vært dekket med dette lolaget og at stoffet har hatt en lysegrå farge. Ulikt skjorta kan verken jeg eller Schjølberg finne spor etter slitasjehull eller lapper.

Resultater (engelsk) 1:

Since warp separators are clearly visible on the front page, the stakes and the sleeve, while little visible on the back of the Sámi clothing in which drug works best preserved, is probably the back most representative of how warp divisions have taken out original. On the back is the saved a lolag which probably stems from an easy fulling, and that makes the color distinctions are less clear. Schjølberg think Sámi clothing has been covered with this lolaget and that the drug has had a light gray color. Unlike the shirt can neither I nor Schjølberg find traces of wear and tear holes or patches.

Resultater (engelsk) 2:

Since warp distinctions are clearly visible on the front, wedges and sleeve, while inconspicuous in the back of kofta which drug works best preserved, is probably back most representative of how the warp divisions have taken out originally. On the back there is preserved a lolag which probably originated from a light fulling, and that makes color distinctions are blurring. Schjølberg think kofta has been covered with this lolaget and that the drug had a light gray color. Unlike shirt can neither I nor Schjølberg find traces of wear holes or patches.

Resultater (engelsk) 3:

Since varpskillene is clearly visible on the front side, wedges and up its sleeve, while not very visible on the back of kofta where the fabric works best preserved, is probably the back most representative of how varpskillene has picked out original. On the back there is preserved a lolag which probably derives from a lightweight valking, and that makes that fargeskillene is less clear.Schjølberg think kofta has been covered with this lolaget and that the fabric has had a light gray color. Unlike shirt can neither i or Schjølberg find traces of slitasjehull or tags.