Fattige og rike land-Forskjellene.D

Fattige og rike land-Forskjellene.

Det er ganske mange forskjeller på fattige å rike land, noen av dem er ikke så store. Men andre er helt forferdelig og at det faktisk er mulig for et menneske å ha det så elendig burde ikke ha vært mulig.

Forskjellene på fattige å rike land kan for eksempel være penger, bolig, mat osv. Det er så forferdelig noen steder at det burde faktisk ikke ha vært mulig, tenk på Syria nå. Med tanke på IS å krigen som er der nå er det helt forferdelig for barna som bor der nå.

I rike land har barn og voksne godt med mat å husly uansett hva, men sånn er det ikke overalt. Det er steder der mennesker lever på under 1$ om dagen, hva hadde du syntes om å leve på 8kr for dagen?

For eksempel her i Norge har de aller fleste penger til ordentlig mat, husly, klær og medisiner å annet nødvendig. Men andre steder har man ikke penger til å gi barna sine mat en gang.

I land der det er krig er det nok ekstra vanskelig for fattige familier, det blir vanskeligere og få tak i mat, drikke og ganske mange av de familiene som bor der blir flyktninger.
Ekstremt mange av de som er flyktninger dør mens de er på flukt, dette er en helt forferdelig ting som egentlig ikke burde skje i det hele tatt.

Mens her i rike land som Norge sitter jo vi praktisk talt å bader i penger, selv de som er ''fattig'' i Norge er jo rik hvis de hadde reist til noen av de fattigste landene. Det er helt latterlig at vi sitter har å har masse ting verdt mange tusen kroner mens folk i fattige land ikke har råd til mat å drikke engang.

Vi burde i utgangspunktet ikke ha latt de landene bli såpass fattig slik at de faktisk trenger så mye hjelp som de trenger nå, vi burde ha delt med dem. Hjulpet dem å finne noe de kunne tjene penger på, å så etter hvert kunne vi egentlig ha tjent penger på å hjelpe disse landene fra å bli så fattig som de er nå. Da hadde vi sluppet å donere så mye som vi gjør nå, så teknisk sett hadde det gått positivt for begge sider.

På offisielle lister over hvor mye mer rike menneske tjener enn de fattige står det at de tjener omtrent 9,6 ganger så mye. I USA er det såpass gale at de tjener 18 ganger så mye og det er noe av det latterligste jeg har sett, noe sånt skulle ikke ha vært mulig engang.

Heldigvis i mange land er fattigdommen på vei vekk, men sånn er ikke tilfellet overalt. I noen land blir det bare verre på grunn av korrupt stat osv, det er helt tåpelig. Vi burde virkelig ta tak i situasjonen i disse landene å gjøre noe med det, men ingen har lyst til å gjøre det ''verre'' for seg selv for at de menneskene som lever på under 2$ for dagen faktisk skal få tak over hodet og mat å drikke til familiene sine.

Av nasjonale årsaker til fattigdom er naturkatastrofer, militære konflikter og politisk styring. Hvis vi ser på globale årsaker er gjelden utviklingslandene har til vesten et stort problem. Asia er den verdensdelen som har størst befolkning, det tilsvarer omtrent 60% av verdens befolkning, og Asia har hatt en enrom økonomisk utvikling. Så hvis vi hadde fjernet Asia fra statistikken for resten av verden er ikke utviklingen like positiv.

For øyeblikket blir situasjonen bedre for mange land, å jeg håper virkelig at det blir bedre for alle landene som er i fattigdom. Hvis vi ikke klarer å gjøre noe med hvordan det er nå vil det ende med et katastrofalt utfall, å det tror jeg ingen vil ende opp med. Så vi må bare ta tak i situasjonen å rette opp i hvordan vi har lagd den til.

Resultater (engelsk) 1:

Poor and rich countries-the differences.There are quite a few differences on the poor to rich countries, some of them are not so great. But others are just terrible and that it actually is possible for a human being to have it so miserable should not have been possible.The differences on the poor to rich countries, for example, money, housing, food, etc. It is so terrible in some places that it should actually not have been possible, think of Syria now. In view of the ICE to the war that is there now, it is just terrible for the children who live there now.In rich countries have children and adults well with food to shelter no matter what, but it's not like that everywhere. There are places where people live on less than 1 $ a day, what had you thought about living on 8kr for the day?For example, here in Norway have the vast majority of the money for proper food, shelter, clothing and medicines to other necessary. But elsewhere, one has no money to give their kids food once.In countries where there is war there is enough extra difficult for poor families, it becomes harder and get food, drinks and quite a few of the families that live there will be refugees.Extremely many of those refugees are dying while they are on the run, this is an absolutely terrible things that really shouldn't happen at all.While here in the rich countries that Norway's we practically to swim in money, even those that are ' ' poor ' ' in Norway's rich if they had travelled to some of the poorest countries. It is absolutely ridiculous that we're sitting has to have lots of things worth many thousands of dollars while people in poor countries cannot afford food to drink even.We should not have let the countries become so poor so that they actually need as much help as they need now, we should have shared with them. Helped them to find something they could make money on, so eventually we could really have earned money to help these countries from being as poor as they are now. Then we had released to donate as much as we do now, so technically there had been positive for both sides.On the official lists of how much more rich than the poor human servant says that they serve about 9.6 times as much. In the United States it is so crazy that they earn 18 times as much and it is some of the most ridiculous I've seen, something like that would not have been possible even.Fortunately, in many countries, poverty on the way out, but that's not the case everywhere. In some countries it will be worse because of the corrupt State etc, it's completely ridiculous. We should really take hold of the situation in these countries to do something about it, but no one wants to do it "worse" for themselves for the people who live on under $ 2 for the day are actually going to get the roof over your head and food to drink to their families.Of national causes of poverty are natural disasters, military conflicts and political governance. If we look at the global causes are the debt developing countries have to the West a large problem. Asia is the world's part that has the greatest population, it is equivalent to about 60% of the world's population, and Asia have had an economic development, Sir. So if we had removed the statistics for Asia from the rest of the world is not the development as positive.For the moment, the situation will be better for many countries, I really hope that it will be better for all the countries that are in poverty. If we do not manage to do something with how it is now it will end with a disastrous outcome, to it I think no one will end up with, so we just have to take hold of the situation to correct in how we have made it to.

Resultater (engelsk) 2:

Poor and rich countries-differences. There are quite a few differences on poor to rich countries, some of them are not so large. But others are absolutely terrible and that it is indeed possible for a human to have it so miserable should not have been possible. The differences between poor to rich countries may include money, housing, food, etc. It is so terrible in some places that it should not actually have been possible, think of Syria now. Considering the IS to the war that is there now it is absolutely terrible for the children who live there now. In rich countries children and adults with good food to shelter whatever, but it is not so everywhere. There are places where people live on less than $ 1 a day, what had you thought about living on 8kr for the day? For example here in Norway have the most money to proper food, shelter, clothing and medicines to other necessities. But elsewhere has no money to give their children food once. In countries where there is war there is enough extra hard for poor families, it becomes harder and obtain food, drinks and quite a few of the families who live there become refugees. Extremely many of those refugees die while they are on the run, this is an absolutely terrible thing that really should not happen at all. While here in rich countries like Norway're sitting we practically bathed in money, even those who are '' poor '' in Norway are rich if they had traveled to some of the poorest countries. It is absolutely ridiculous that we are have to have lots of things worth many thousand kroner while people in poor countries can not afford food to drink even. We should basically not have left those countries become so poor so they actually need as much help that they need now, we should have shared with them. Helped them find something they could make money, to then eventually we could really have earned money by helping these countries from being as poor as they are now. Then we had released to donate as much as we do now, so technically there had been positive for both sides. On the official lists of how much more rich man servant than the poor states that they serve approximately 9.6 times as much. In the US there are so crazy that they earn 18 times as much and it is one of the most ridiculous I've seen something like that would not have been possible even. Fortunately in many countries poverty is on its way away, but that's not the case everywhere. In some countries, only worse because of corrupt government, etc., it is absolutely foolish. We should really take hold of the situation in these countries to do something about it, but nobody wants to do it '' worse '' for themselves that the people living on under $ 2 for the day actually going to get a roof over your head and food to drink to their families. By national causes of poverty is natural disasters, military conflicts and political governance. If we look at global causes are debt developing countries to the West a major problem. Asia is the continent which has the largest population, that equals about 60% of the world population, and Asia have had a enrome economic development. So if we had removed Asia from the statistics for the rest of the world development is not as positive. At the moment the situation is better for many countries, to I really hope that it gets better for all countries in poverty. If we fail to do something about how it is now it will end with a disastrous outcome to it, I think nobody will end up. So we just have to grasp the situation to rectify how we have made ​​it.

Resultater (engelsk) 3:

Poor and rich countries-Differences.

There are quite a few differences on the poor to rich countries, some of them are not so great. But the other is absolutely terrible and that it actually is possible for a man to have it so awful should not have been possible.

differences on the poor to rich countries can for example be money, residential, food etc. It is so terrible some places that it should actually not have been possible,Think of Syria now. Considering the ice to the war that is where now it is absolutely terrible for the kids who live there now.

IN rich countries have children and adults well with food to shelter no matter what but thats it not everywhere. There are places where people live on under 1$ about day, What had you thought about living on the 8kr for the day?

For example here in Norway have the vast majority of money to the proper food, shelter,Clothing and medicines to other required. But other places have not money to give their children food once.

in countries where there is war there is enough extra difficult for poor families, it becomes more difficult and get in the food, drink and quite a few of the families who lives there will be refugees.
Extremely many of those refugees door while they are on the deck,This is an absolutely terrible things that really should not happen at all.

while here in the rich countries that Norway is seated we virtually to bathe in money, even those ''poor'' in Norway is the rich if they had gone to some of the poorest countries. It is absolutely ridiculous that we have to have lots of things worth many thousands of dollars while the people in poor countries do not have advice to food to drink disposable.

We should initially not have left the countries will be sufficiently poor so that they are actually need as much help as they need now, we should have shared with them. Helped them to find something they could earn money, to so after each we could actually have earned money to help these countries from becoming so poor that they are now. When we had released to donate as much as we do now,So technically had been positive for both sides.

on official lists of how much more rich man servant than the poor is that they serve approximately 9.6 times as much. In the United States is there a sufficiently wrong that the servant 18 times as much and there is some of the latterligste i have seen something like that would not have been possible disposable.

Fortunately in many countries is poverty on roads away,But thats not the case everywhere. In some countries there will be only worse due to corrupt state etc, it is completely silly. We really should take hold of the situation in these countries to do something about it but no one wants to do the ''rre'' for themselves that the people who live on under 2$ for the day actually should get a roof over your head and food to drink to their families.

Of the national causes of poverty is a natural disaster, military conflicts and political control. If we look at the global causes are debt developing countries have to the west a big problem. Asia is the world part that has the most population, it corresponds to about 60% of the population of the world, and Asia has had a enrom economic development.So if we had been removed from Asia statistics for the rest of the world is not the development as positive.

currently situation better for many countries, to I really hope that it will be better for all countries that are in poverty. If we are not able to do anything with how it is now it will end with a catastrophic shutdown, to i think will end up with.So we must only take hold of the situation to correct in how we have made it to.